UWEB:Status/Jamie
- NotYet While I don't mind the colour options (green or orange), but I don't think the symbol is clear enough. The little picture is too ambiguous. I don't immediately recognize it as chalk, what's worse I don't associate it with Wikis, nor editing. We are on the right track, but we need to try again.
edit
- NotYet While I don't mind the colour options (green or orange), but I don't think the symbol is clear enough. The little picture is too ambiguous. I don't immediately recognize it as chalk, what's worse I don't associate it with Wikis, nor editing. We are on the right track, but we need to try again.
Hi Jamie, setting aside the actual image for the moment, does the concept of chalk work for you? Do the principles as they're written work for you? Does the idea that the image can evolve over time, as the RSS image has, work for you? peace, TedErnst | talk 07:25, 21 October 2007 (PDT) (also sent email to 
linking here - hope that's the right address)
- I do like the chalk somewhat, on the principle that it can be 'erased' and modified again.
- With that said, so can pencil, which might just be that much more recognizable.
- As with any good wiki, the image SHOULD evolve over time... the idea is amazing and the icon certainly isn't the worst I have ever seen. :)
- Let's keep brainstorming though. (What about a pencil?)
- --99.236.118.51 19:15, 25 October 2007 (PDT) (Jamie of the MarvelDatabase)
- We do have a pencil in the history, having been proposed before. Personally, I'm not too worried about how recognizable it is, because I think it'll get just better over time. The pencil is more recognizable to me at the moment, I must admit. Let me know if you'd like me to dig up the image for you. peace, TedErnst | talk 19:23, 25 October 2007 (PDT)
