Difference between revisions of "BiLinkTemplate"
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) m (→BiLinkTemplate a misnomer, please correct) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== BiLinkTemplate a misnomer, please correct == | == BiLinkTemplate a misnomer, please correct == | ||
| − | + | Mark, | |
| + | on [[http://www.aboutus.org/User:Ray%20King?version=-1]] | ||
| + | I found in the source part of the wiki page, a [[BiLink]] template | ||
| + | and thought, somebody had invented a new method to create automatically | ||
| + | BiLinks between two "BiLinkable" wikis. Unfortunately it created something different, only a LinkPair. Although I love this template and find it also nice and useful, nevertheless it dillutes the valuable | ||
| + | concept of BiLinks, which are meant to heal the chronical disease of one-way | ||
| + | links in the current Web. Wikis have the chance to get BiLinked internally and externally. We shouldn't forget that until we can realize true BiLink templates, which makes it easier for the wikizens to "Weave the Web", at least the sub-Web of all BiLinkable Wikis. | ||
So LinkPair gives the correct name for the template. | So LinkPair gives the correct name for the template. | ||
| − | + | Let's {{g|FosterEachOther}} | |
| + | [[User:Fridemar|fridemar]] 15:56, 8 July 2009 (PDT) | ||
| − | See also [[http://www.springerlink.com/content/95802123379m8260/ Springerlink: | + | PS.: To make this posting persistant, I put it on [[BiLinkTemplate]] for |
| + | two reasons: (a) to keep you talkpage cleanable (b) to make the idea of | ||
| + | more powerful templates (with a more powerful template engine) memorable and referable. | ||
| + | |||
| + | See also [[http://www.springerlink.com/content/95802123379m8260/ Springerlink: Bidirectional Links for Web Annotation Stickies]] | ||
[[Category: WeavingTheWeb]] | [[Category: WeavingTheWeb]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:56, 8 July 2009
BiLinkTemplate a misnomer, please correct
Mark, on [[1]] I found in the source part of the wiki page, a BiLink template and thought, somebody had invented a new method to create automatically BiLinks between two "BiLinkable" wikis. Unfortunately it created something different, only a LinkPair. Although I love this template and find it also nice and useful, nevertheless it dillutes the valuable concept of BiLinks, which are meant to heal the chronical disease of one-way links in the current Web. Wikis have the chance to get BiLinked internally and externally. We shouldn't forget that until we can realize true BiLink templates, which makes it easier for the wikizens to "Weave the Web", at least the sub-Web of all BiLinkable Wikis. So LinkPair gives the correct name for the template.
Let's G FosterEachOther fridemar 15:56, 8 July 2009 (PDT)
PS.: To make this posting persistant, I put it on BiLinkTemplate for two reasons: (a) to keep you talkpage cleanable (b) to make the idea of more powerful templates (with a more powerful template engine) memorable and referable.
See also [Springerlink: Bidirectional Links for Web Annotation Stickies]
